Proof of consent - The Judge erred in Aga Khan Copyright Case, says Oxford Professor and IP expert - 2011-01-31
Purported "Talika" in JK Tonight - 2011-01-21
Court Gives Summary Judgement in Aga Khan Copyright Case - 2011-01-10
2011-01-10 Court Gives Summary Judgement in Copyright Case - PDF
On January 7, 2011, The Judge filed an injunction and reasons for Judgment.
View the pdf below to read the Judgment and the Reasons for Judgment.
The Final Order was to be drafted separately.
See subsequent pages in this online book to read how:
- On January 21, 2011, There was a suspect "Talika" in select JK's that sounded more like a pressure tactic to get defendants to sign a very broad order drafted by the "Plaintiff"'s Lawyer. It referred to this judgment as the basis for the future policies of the Imamat.
- On February 7, 2011, The Defendants filed an appeal on the last possible date because noone was willing to discuss anything with them.
- On February 8, 2011, The "Plaintiff" motioned to get a Final Judgment according to their broad draft.
- On February 14, 2011, The "Plaintiff" motioned to get the Appeal dismissed for being premature because no final order was signed. (Funny that the "Talika", sent out by Sachedina's office, and referring to this judgment, was not considered premature? At that time, there was no final order yet and discussions on the contents of the order remained to be undertaken?)
- On March 4, 2011, A final order was issued that was still very broad
- On March 14, 2011, The "Plaintiff's" motion to dismiss the appeal was itself dismissed.
Subsequently,
- The Counsel for Plaintiff started procedures and sending letters to expedite the fulfilling of the order before the appeal, namely, he demanded the $30,000 and he demanded a discovery with Names of the recipients of books.
- The defendants motioned to amend the Notice of appeal and to consolidate both the appeals of Tajdin and Jiwa, in order to save time and resources.
.....
The Vedas as Sources of Satpanthi Ismaili Ginan Literature
Dr Gulshan Khakee
Copyright Lawsuit: Defendants are continuously attacked, assaulted - 2010-12-31
2010-12-07 Summary Judgment Motion Hearing for Copyright Lawsuit Lasted 2-Days
The Hearing for the Plaintiff's and the Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions was Held in Toronto On December 7 & 8.
Here is the entry in the Court Docket:
http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php…
Toronto 07-DEC-2010
BEFORE The Honourable Mr. Justice Harrington
Language: E
Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 20 on behalf of Defendant (Jiwa)
Result of Hearing: Matter reserved
Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 28 on behalf of Defendant (Tajdin)
Result of Hearing: Matter reserved
Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 36 on behalf of Plaintiff
Result of Hearing: Matter reserved
held in Court Senior Usher: Noel Nation
Duration per day: 07-DEC-2010 from 09:30 to 04:45
Courtroom : Courtroom No. 4-A - Toronto
Court Registrar: Jeff Weir
08-DEC-2010 from 09:15 to 03:05
Courtroom : Courtroom No. 4-A - Toronto
Court Registrar: Jeff Weir
Total Duration: 2d
Appearances: Brian Gray, Allyson Whyte Nowak (416) 216-4000 representing Plaintiff Alnaz Jiwa (905) 640-3831_ representing Defendant Jiwa Nagib Tajdin (514) 212-5789 representing Defendant Tajdin Court Reporter: Calypso Schincariol, ASAP Reporting Services Ltd (416) 861-8720 07-DEC-2010 Calypso Schincariol, ASAP Reporting Services Ltd. (416) 861-8720 08-DEC-2010
Transcript not requested
Comments: Index of Materials filed for Summary Judgment Motions and Plaintiff's and Defendants loose authorities and Plaintiff's Draft Bill of Costs to be received
Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 835 page(s) 51 - 61 Abstract of Hearing placed on file

